Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Contested EmbraceTransborder Membership Politics in Twentieth-Century Korea$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jaeeun Kim

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9780804797627

Published to Stanford Scholarship Online: January 2017

DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804797627.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM STANFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Stanford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in SSO for personal use (for details see http://www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 16 December 2017

Making, Unmaking, and Remaking Transborder Ties

Making, Unmaking, and Remaking Transborder Ties

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction Making, Unmaking, and Remaking Transborder Ties
Source:
Contested Embrace
Author(s):

Jaeeun Kim

Publisher:
Stanford University Press
DOI:10.11126/stanford/9780804797627.003.0001

This chapter begins with three ethnographic vignettes that reveal the common experiences of colonial-era ethnic Korean migrants and their descendants in Japan and northeast China: forcible separation from and neglect by their state of origin; shifting sense of loyalty and belonging to multiple states involved; efforts to maintain, rebuild, or take advantage of cross-border family ties; and complex dealings with various documentation practices in attempts to reclaim membership in their putative “homeland.” The chapter situates the book in the literature on transborder membership politics and discusses its distinctive contributions. Building on a wide range of literature on official classification practices, modern identification techniques, the symbolic power of the state, and the control of cross-border migration, this chapter proposes a set of theoretical arguments about how states’ registration and documentation practices contribute to the making, unmaking, and remaking of the “homeland state” and the “transborder nation.”

Keywords:   international migration, citizenship, nationalism, transnationalism, symbolic power, border control, Korea, China, Japan

Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.