Framing Incomplete Contracts
Framing Incomplete Contracts
Incomplete contracts and the implication of terms in contract disputes are the subjects of a considerable debate in legal scholarship and judicial opinion. This debate plays an indirect role in a cultural conflict over the individual subject and has centered on questions of how courts should supply missing contract terms, as well as what those missing terms should be. This chapter discusses the significance and effects of this debate by looking at the major attempts to deal with the problem in the scholarly literature, and also examines the relationship of the various scholarly discussions of incompleteness to the implied covenant of good faith. Furthermore, it considers the division of functions between interpretation and the determination of legal relations, or construction. Finally, the chapter comments on hypothetical bargain theory and default rules analysis.
Keywords: incomplete contracts, missing terms, incompleteness, good faith, hypothetical bargain theory, default rules analysis, interpretation, construction, legal relations, contract terms
Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
