Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Equivocation of ReasonKleist Reading Kant$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James Phillips

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780804755870

Published to Stanford Scholarship Online: June 2013

DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804755870.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM STANFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Stanford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in SSO for personal use.date: 19 September 2021

Penthesilea and the Law Before Oedipus

Penthesilea and the Law Before Oedipus

(p.26) One Penthesilea and the Law Before Oedipus
The Equivocation of Reason
Stanford University Press

This chapter argues that Kantian Law is philosophically prior rather than an encryption of the Oedipus complex. Its priority is not the fictional priority of that which has abstracted from the biological and psychological desires of the organism. The claim for the priority of the Law rests on Kant's definition of desire. Kantian Law originates in a domain that preexists oedipalization. This is also the domain of Kleist's Penthesilea. The chapter presents a reading of Kantian ethics in conjunction with Kleist's pre-classical tragedy to demonstrate that more is involved here than a play upon Freud's classicist terminology.

Keywords:   Kantian Law, Oedipus complex, Heinrich von Kleist, Kantian ethics, moral act, desire

Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.