Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Equivocation of ReasonKleist Reading Kant$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James Phillips

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780804755870

Published to Stanford Scholarship Online: June 2013

DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804755870.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM STANFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Stanford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in SSO for personal use.date: 01 June 2020

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.112) Conclusion
Source:
The Equivocation of Reason
Publisher:
Stanford University Press
DOI:10.11126/stanford/9780804755870.003.0004

This chapter summarizes the preceding discussions and presents some final thoughts. It analyzes Kleist's work and his interpretation of Kant. It argues that Kleist's turn to literature after the Kant crisis is less a turn away from truth to fantasy than a turn away from necessary truth to contingent truth. The fantastic element in Kleist's works is properly the unpredictability of contingent truth. In this regard, Kleist is a son of the Enlightenment.

Keywords:   Heinrich von Kleist, Kant, Enlightenment, Reason, truth

Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.