This chapter summarizes the preceding discussions and presents some final thoughts. It analyzes Kleist's work and his interpretation of Kant. It argues that Kleist's turn to literature after the Kant crisis is less a turn away from truth to fantasy than a turn away from necessary truth to contingent truth. The fantastic element in Kleist's works is properly the unpredictability of contingent truth. In this regard, Kleist is a son of the Enlightenment.
Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.