Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Anonymous LifeRomanticism and Dispossession$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jacques Khalip

Print publication date: 2008

Print ISBN-13: 9780804758406

Published to Stanford Scholarship Online: June 2013

DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804758406.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM STANFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Stanford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in SSO for personal use.date: 02 June 2020

Coda What Remains: Romanticism and the Negative

Coda What Remains: Romanticism and the Negative

Chapter:
(p.173) Coda What Remains: Romanticism and the Negative
Source:
Anonymous Life
Publisher:
Stanford University Press
DOI:10.11126/stanford/9780804758406.003.0006

This chapter presents some final thoughts from the author. It returns to Keats and Shelley in order to demonstrate just how both poets explore “negatively capable” models of subjectivity that oppose the kind of “identity-thinking” Adorno warns us against. Indeed, the negativity that runs in their work draws attention to the complex relations through which the dispossessed subject comes to bear no (re)productive possibility, no referential positivities that might announce it as a pivot point for ethical and aesthetic reflection.

Keywords:   Keats, Shelley, poets, poetry, subjectivity

Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.