Sapiro v. Ford left a number of unanswered questions, such as what jurors would have decided had the libel suit run its course. While a jury verdict and damage award might have been personally gratifying for Aaron Sapiro, they would have further alienated him from Louis Marshall and the Jewish civil rights establishment and probably caused a rift among Jews. The jurors appeared to be skeptic toward Henry Ford and the allegations against Sapiro, and aware that Sapiro had made mistakes and that the cooperative movement was flawed. However, they rejected the notion that a conspiracy was responsible for the farmers' misfortunes. The case should have ended Ford's public career, but his apology bought him viability. Anti-Semitism persisted in American society as an acceptable, respectable prejudice after Sapiro v. Ford. Nevertheless, the case displayed Sapiro's heroism and bravery in confronting a national bully like Ford and Marshall's hope that the apology he wrote for Ford would create a permanent place for immigrant Jews in America's industrial future.
Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.