Against Sovereign Impunity
Against Sovereign Impunity
The Political Theology of the International Criminal Court
This chapter construes the recently established International Criminal Court as the “sovereignty-less conscience of humanity.” It argues that the ICC is amenable to analysis in terms of political theology, but one that draws on John Locke rather than on Hobbes's and Schmitt's notions of the absolutist state. Although a court of final judgment, the ICC does not dispense divine punitive justice with an apocalyptic coloring. Rather, the ICC is informed by a divine restorative justice that opposes impunity. This chapter suggests that the ICC's protection of human rights represents a theologico-political determination that potentially replaces or qualifies Schmitt's absolutism.
Keywords: ICC, political theology, absolutist state, divine restorative justice
Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.
