Adversarial Legalism and the Emergence of a New European Legality: A Comparative Perspective
Adversarial Legalism and the Emergence of a New European Legality: A Comparative Perspective
This chapter highlights the cultural contingency of the public/private distinction, contrasting the regime of private and public law in the United States to that in Europe. Using Blackstonian categories, private law is classified as “intrinsically bipolar” because it relies on private actors (plaintiffs) to pursue those who committed wrongs. Private law has prospered in the United States, and civil litigation has increased rapidly. In European nations, the need for private litigation is often eclipsed by generous public rights. In contrast, the realm of public rights in the United States is small relative to many European social democracies: since the 1960s, the trend in the United States has been to promote the private enforcement of public rights. The discussion of public and private rights is also extended to the healthcare debate. Finally, the chapter considers the possibility of convergence, with the European legal system becoming more Americanized and adversarial, and the American becoming somewhat more responsive to public rights claims.
Keywords: private law, public law, European law, American law, healthcare, litigation
Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.