Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Britain and the BombNuclear Diplomacy, 1964-1970$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David James Gill

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780804786584

Published to Stanford Scholarship Online: May 2014

DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804786584.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM STANFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Stanford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in SSO for personal use.date: 22 October 2019

Introduction

Introduction

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction
Source:
Britain and the Bomb
Author(s):

David James Gill

Publisher:
Stanford University Press
DOI:10.11126/stanford/9780804786584.003.0001

This chapter introduces the book as account of Harold Wilson and the Labour government’s attempts to balance a collection of disparate, and at times competing, influences in the context of British nuclear diplomacy. The chapter establishes the major contributions of the book and then provides an overview of each of the following chapters. The central argument is that British nuclear diplomacy was a series of compromises, an intricate blend of political, economic, and strategic considerations. Cabinet debate, financial crises, and international tensions all influenced nuclear policy-making in the two Labour governments of this period.

Keywords:   Nuclear history, nuclear diplomacy, Wilson, Labour government, politics, economics, strategy

Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.