Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Legacy of PluralismThe Continental Jurisprudence of Santi Romano, Carl Schmitt, and Costantino Mortati$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mariano Croce and Marco Goldoni

Print publication date: 2020

Print ISBN-13: 9781503612112

Published to Stanford Scholarship Online: January 2021

DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9781503612112.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM STANFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.stanford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Stanford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in SSO for personal use.date: 19 September 2021

Santi Romano and the Juristic Point of View

Santi Romano and the Juristic Point of View

Chapter:
(p.51) Chapter Two Santi Romano and the Juristic Point of View
Source:
The Legacy of Pluralism
Author(s):

Mariano Croce

Marco Goldoni

Publisher:
Stanford University Press
DOI:10.11126/stanford/9781503612112.003.0003

Chapter title: Santi Romano and the Juristic Point of ViewChapter abstract: This chapter illustrates Romano’s groundbreaking theory by presenting his conceptions of institutionalism and pluralism as coherently glued together. All that is organized is an institution; all institutions are legal entities. No privileged legal entity exists that can claim other entities are not legal. Based on this radical view, Romano’s overall contribution comes down to the conclusion that the only way to make social and political pluralism work is to provide a purely jurisprudential account of it—one that remains within the boundaries of the juristic practice and downplays politics as an ancillary, contextual activity of governing. The chapter then makes the case that Romano intended to put forward a conception of legal theory as a technique of description that is capable of engendering particular social outcomes—as well as effects of domestication and compatibility in so far as social pluralism is concerned.

Keywords:   constitutional theory, institutionalism, legal order, legal pluralism, Llewellyn, Luhmann, nonstate law, Romano, social pluralism

Stanford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.